Ethereum: Does 43% whale ownership raise concerns for ETH?

• Over 43% of Ethereum’s supply is concentrated in three whale addresses
• Concentrated ownership risks price manipulation, volatility, and decentralized governance erosion

Ethereum’s [ETH] supply is now highly concentrated, with just three whales holding over 43% of the total ETH supply.

This level of concentration is far from typical in decentralized networks and raises significant concerns about the potential for price manipulation, market volatility, and the overall health of the Ethereum ecosystem.

As the market continues to evolve, understanding the implications of this centralized ownership becomes crucial for both investors and the future stability of Ethereum.

The current state of Ethereum’s supply

Source: X

As of now, Ethereum’s supply is notably centralized, with just three whales collectively controlling 43.14% of the total ETH supply, amounting to 60.8 million ETH.

The largest whale alone accounts for 39.56%, highlighting the significant influence a single entity can have on the network.

Such concentrated ownership raises concerns about potential market manipulation, especially if these whales engage in coordinated selling or staking.

Recent trends in staking activities by high-activity addresses and their impact on Ethereum’s price volatility underscore the critical role these whales play in shaping market behavior and stability.

Ethereum: How centralization affects retail investors

The concentration of Ethereum’s supply in the hands of three whales poses significant challenges for retail investors. Price manipulation becomes a looming threat, as even slight movements of these massive holdings can trigger sharp market swings, wiping out smaller investors’ gains.

Moreover, such centralization undermines the ethos of decentralization, reducing retail participants’ influence in network governance, particularly in staking and voting mechanisms.

On a psychological level, retail investors might hesitate to engage, perceiving the ecosystem as skewed in favor of dominant players. This imbalance could stifle broader adoption and innovation, as trust in the network’s fairness diminishes.

A comparison of ETH’s supply distribution 

Ethereum’s supply concentration starkly contrasts with the distribution seen in other major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin [BTC], Cardano [ADA], and Ripple[XRP].

As per Santiment data, BTC exhibits a comparatively decentralized supply, with whale holdings distributed more evenly across address brackets.

Source: Santiment

ADA demonstrates a moderate level of centralization, where large holders possess significant, but not overwhelming, shares of the total supply.

Source: Santiment

XRP, however, shows a mixed pattern, with several whale addresses holding large portions, albeit less centralized than ETH.

Source: Santiment

While other networks maintain varying degrees of decentralization, Ethereum’s has a great reliance on a small group of influential holders.

This imbalance not only impacts market stability but also challenges the foundational principles of decentralization that cryptos aim to uphold.

---

Read Ethereum’s [ETH] Price Prediction 2025–2026

---

Risks of concentrated ownership

Whales controlling over 40% of the Ethereum supply pose significant risks to the network. Their ability to execute massive buy or sell orders can manipulate prices, creating sharp volatility and eroding market stability.

This concentration undermines Ethereum’s decentralized ethos, allowing a small group to dominate network governance and potentially skew decisions, such as protocol upgrades or fee structures.

Regulatory scrutiny is another concern, as authorities may view whale-driven networks as vulnerable to manipulation, prompting stricter oversight or classification as securities.

Additionally, the threat of a large-scale whale sell-off, or “dump,” could flood the market with ETH, crashing prices and destabilizing investor confidence, which could ripple across the broader crypto ecosystem.